{"id":355,"date":"2009-04-04T14:23:38","date_gmt":"2009-04-04T12:23:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/?p=355"},"modified":"2019-03-27T14:39:29","modified_gmt":"2019-03-27T13:39:29","slug":"la-decision-du-juge-de-la-mise-en-etat-rejetant-une-fin-de-non-recevoir-est-elle-susceptible-dun-appel-immediat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/2009\/04\/04\/la-decision-du-juge-de-la-mise-en-etat-rejetant-une-fin-de-non-recevoir-est-elle-susceptible-dun-appel-immediat\/","title":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9cision du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat rejetant une fin de non recevoir est-elle susceptible d\u2019un appel imm\u00e9diat?"},"content":{"rendered":"<header class=\"entry-header\">\n<div class=\"comments-link\"><strong>Edit: 15 septembre 2013:<\/strong> en cons\u00e9quence de la r\u00e9forme des textes relatifs \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019appel avec repr\u00e9sentation obligatoire, entr\u00e9e en vigueur \u00e0 compter du 1er janvier 2011, la Cour de cassation <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_1');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_1');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_1\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(1)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_1\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000027303879&amp;fastReqId=1247759758&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. 1re civ., 10 avril 2013, n\u00b0 12-14939<\/a><\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_1').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_1', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> indique que \u00ab\u00a0<em>les ordonnances du conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat statuant sur la fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019appel ont autorit\u00e9 de chose jug\u00e9e au principal et, en ce cas, peuvent \u00eatre d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9es par simple requ\u00eate \u00e0 la cour d\u2019appel dans les quinze jours de leur date<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0. Tout recours exerc\u00e9 par ailleurs est donc irrecevable.<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p><strong>EDIT du 25 janvier 2014<\/strong>: par un arr\u00eat de la 2e chambre civile du\u00a011\u00a0juillet\u00a02013 <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_2');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_2');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_2\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(2)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_2\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Cass. 2e civ., 11 juillet 2013, n\u00b012-15.994, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/IMG\/pdf\/bicc_794-2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">BICC n\u00b0 794<\/a>\u00a0du 15 janvier 2014, p.2 et p.11<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_2').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_2', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>, la Cour de cassation affirme que \u00ab\u00a0<em>Il r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019article\u00a0776, 1o, du code de proc\u00e9dure civile que,\u00a0m\u00eame lorsqu\u2019elles ne mettent pas fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance, les ordonnances\u00a0du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat statuant sur un incident de nature \u00e0\u00a0y mettre fin peuvent \u00eatre frapp\u00e9es d\u2019appel ind\u00e9pendamment du\u00a0jugement sur le fond.\u00a0En cons\u00e9quence, est recevable l\u2019appel form\u00e9 contre l\u2019ordonnance\u00a0du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat rejetant un incident de p\u00e9remption\u00a0d\u2019instance<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0<span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_3');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_3');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_3\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(3)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_3\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Roger Perrot, \u00ab\u00a0Appel contre les ordonnances\u00a0\u00bb,\u00a0Proc\u00e9dures,\u00a0n\u00b010, octobre\u00a02013, commentaire n\u00b0276, p.\u00a028<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_3').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_3', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n<p>M. le professeur Perrot, dans son commentaire du d\u00e9cret n\u00b02005-1678 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2005 <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_4');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_4');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_4\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(4)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_4\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Proc\u00e9dures 2006\/2, \u00e9tude 3, n\u00b016<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_4').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_4', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> indiquait d\u00e9j\u00e0 que la modification de l\u2019article 775 du CPC qui donnait force de chose jug\u00e9e aux ordonnances du JME statuant sur les exceptions de proc\u00e9dure et sur les incidents mettant fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance, posait le probl\u00e8me de la qualification de l\u2019ordonnance rejetant une exception qui, si elle avait \u00e9t\u00e9 recevable aurait mis fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance. L\u2019article 771 CPC a \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 modifi\u00e9 par le d\u00e9cret de 2005, ce afin d\u2019interdire aux parties de soulever les incidents mettant fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance et les exceptions de proc\u00e9dure ult\u00e9rieurement, \u00e0 moins qu\u2019ils ne surviennent ou ne soient r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9s post\u00e9rieurement au dessaisissement du JME.<\/p>\n<p>Une fin de non recevoir telle l\u2019exception de chose jug\u00e9e, si elle est accueillie, est bien un incident mettant fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance, la d\u00e9cision qui l\u2019accueille a donc force de chose jug\u00e9e et est susceptible d\u2019un appel imm\u00e9diat conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 544 CPC. Lorsqu\u2019au contraire, le JME rejette l\u2019exception de chose jug\u00e9e, sa d\u00e9cision est-elle imm\u00e9diatement susceptible d\u2019appel ou bien la question doit-elle \u00eatre soumise \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel en m\u00eame temps que le jugement au fond? Comme l\u2019indiquait M. le professeur Perrot, si l\u2019exception de chose jug\u00e9e ne peut plus \u00eatre soulev\u00e9e devant la formation coll\u00e9giale lorsqu\u2019elle ne l\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 devant le JME, il en va autrement du d\u00e9bat sur le bien fond\u00e9 du rejet de cette exception par le JME qui doit pouvoir ensuite \u00eatre soumis \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel en m\u00eame temps que la d\u00e9cision au fond ou que la d\u00e9cision ayant tranch\u00e9e une partie du principal. L\u2019appel imm\u00e9diat n\u2019est donc pas recevable.<\/p>\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000017907641&amp;fastReqId=942516585&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">4 juillet 2007<\/a>\u00a0<span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_5');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_5');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_5\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(5)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_5\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000017907641&amp;fastReqId=663046700&amp;fastPos=1\">civ. 2e, 4 juillet 2007, n\u00b006-20500, Bull. n\u00b0180<\/a>, rapport Loriferne<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_5').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_5', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>, la 2e chambre civile de la Cour de cassation approuve la Cour d\u2019appel qui d\u00e9clare irrecevable l\u2019appel imm\u00e9diat contre un jugement rejetant l\u2019exception tir\u00e9e du d\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 pour agir. L\u2019ordonnance du JME qui rejette une exception de proc\u00e9dure ou une fin de non recevoir ou tout autre incident mettant fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance n\u2019a pas autorit\u00e9 de chose jug\u00e9e et la Cour d\u2019appel peut \u00eatre saisie de la m\u00eame demande \u00e0 l\u2019occasion de l\u2019appel du jugement au fond<span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_6');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_6');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_6\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(6)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_6\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000018339554&amp;fastReqId=905729771&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 2e, 13 mars 2008, n\u00b007-11384<\/a>, Bull. 68, rapport Lacabarats<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_6').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_6', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>. Le fait d\u2019interjeter un appel g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pr\u00e9sente un int\u00e9r\u00eat tout particulier puisqu\u2019il n\u2019est pas limit\u00e9 au seul jugement sur le fond, mais d\u00e9f\u00e8rera \u00e0 la Cour la totalit\u00e9 du litige y compris les d\u00e9cisions du JME n\u2019ayant pas autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e: la 3e chambre civile par un arr\u00eat du 13 juin 2007 <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_7');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_7');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_7\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(7)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_7\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000017895594&amp;fastReqId=375769350&amp;fastPos=1\">3e civ., 13 juin 2007, n\u00b006-11784<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0103, rapport Monge<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_7').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_7', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>, approuve la Cour d\u2019appel qui, saisie d\u2019un appel g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, accueille la contestation ne portant que sur les d\u00e9cisions relatives \u00e0 un sursis \u00e0 statuer et \u00e0 l\u2019instauration d\u2019une mesure d\u2019expertise <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_8');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_8');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_8\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(8)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_8\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007026704&amp;fastReqId=458632872&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">3e civ. 19 juin 1991, n\u00b087-20014<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0178<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_8').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_8', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>. En revanche, est irrecevable l\u2019appel limit\u00e9 \u00e0 un chef du jugement qui n\u2019est pas susceptible, seul, d\u2019ouvrir la voie \u00e0 un appel imm\u00e9diat <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_9');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_9');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_9\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(9)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_9\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007019280&amp;fastReqId=1176957925&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 1re, 21 juillet 1987, n\u00b085-13417<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0233<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_9').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_9', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>.<\/p>\n<p>Les m\u00eames principes valent pour les d\u00e9cisions du Conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019elles ne mettent pas fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance et ne rentrent pas dans les cas pr\u00e9vus par l\u2019article 914 CPC. La 2e chambre civile de la Cour de cassation censure la Cour d\u2019appel qui retient la recevabilit\u00e9 du d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la Cour s\u2019agissant d\u2019une ordonnance du CME qui d\u00e9clarait l\u2019appel recevable <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_10');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_10');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_10\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(10)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_10\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000019781227&amp;fastReqId=2019421818&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 1re, 19 novembre 2008, n\u00b007-12523<\/a>, Rapport Loriferne, Avis Marotte, Bull. n\u00b0251<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_10').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_10', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script> et censure \u00e9galement la Cour d\u2019appel qui, saisie d\u2019une fin de non-recevoir, la rejette au motif que l\u2019ordonnance du CME ayant d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019appel recevable serait assortie de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 de chose jug\u00e9e <span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_11');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_11');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_11\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(11)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_11\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000019966666&amp;fastReqId=615985016&amp;fastPos=1\">civ. 2e, 18 d\u00e9cembre 2008, n\u00b007-20599<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0276, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/publications_26\/bulletin_information_cour_cassation_27\/bulletins_information_2009_2866\/n_701_3145\/#c628\">BICC 701, n\u00b0628<\/a>, rapport M. Andr\u00e9.<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_11').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_11', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>.<\/p>\n<p>Le conseiller rapporteur M. ANDRE pr\u00e9cise \u00e0 cette occasion que si la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019est pas tenue de soulever d\u2019office la fin de non recevoir pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment soumise au CME d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019intim\u00e9 ne le lui demande pas<span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_12');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_12');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_12\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(12)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_12\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007040643&amp;fastReqId=1944076103&amp;fastPos=1\">Cass. civ. 10 novembre 1998, n\u00b096-16267<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0265<\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_12').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_12', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>, elle peut d\u00e9cider d\u2019office de d\u00e9clarer l\u2019appel irrecevable nonobstant la d\u00e9cision du\u00a0CME\u00a0<span class=\"footnote_referrer\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_13');\" onkeypress=\"footnote_moveToReference_355_1('footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_13');\" ><sup id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_13\" class=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text\">(13)<\/sup><\/a><span id=\"footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_13\" class=\"footnote_tooltip\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007223766&amp;fastReqId=528483137&amp;fastPos=1\">Com. 31 mai 1994, n\u00b092-10727<\/a><\/span><\/span><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_13').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_355_1_13', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });<\/script>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<footer class=\"entry-meta\">Cette entr\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9e dans Proc\u00e9dure civile, et marqu\u00e9e avec 10 avril 2013, 12-14939, Appel imm\u00e9diat, Article 544 CPC, Article 776 CPC, Article 914 CPC, Cass. 1re civ., Conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat, Fin de non-recevoir, Incident mettant fin \u00e0 l&rsquo;instance, Mise en \u00e9tat, n\u00b0 12-14.939, Proc\u00e9dure civile, Recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;appel, le <time class=\"entry-date\" datetime=\"2009-04-04T12:00:00+00:00\">4 avril 2009<\/time> <span class=\"by-author\">par <span class=\"author vcard\">matringe<\/span><\/span>.<\/footer>\n<div class=\"speaker-mute footnotes_reference_container\"> <div class=\"footnote_container_prepare\"><p><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_label pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_355_1();\">References<\/span><span role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button\" style=\"display: none;\" onclick=\"footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_355_1();\">[<a id=\"footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_355_1\">+<\/a>]<\/span><\/p><\/div> <div id=\"footnote_references_container_355_1\" style=\"\"><table class=\"footnotes_table footnote-reference-container\"><caption class=\"accessibility\">References<\/caption> <tbody> \r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_1\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_1');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>1<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000027303879&amp;fastReqId=1247759758&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. 1re civ., 10 avril 2013, n\u00b0 12-14939<\/a><\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_2\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_2');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>2<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Cass. 2e civ., 11 juillet 2013, n\u00b012-15.994, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/IMG\/pdf\/bicc_794-2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">BICC n\u00b0 794<\/a>\u00a0du 15 janvier 2014, p.2 et p.11<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_3\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_3');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>3<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Roger Perrot, \u00ab\u00a0Appel contre les ordonnances\u00a0\u00bb,\u00a0Proc\u00e9dures,\u00a0n\u00b010, octobre\u00a02013, commentaire n\u00b0276, p.\u00a028<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_4\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_4');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>4<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Proc\u00e9dures 2006\/2, \u00e9tude 3, n\u00b016<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_5\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_5');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>5<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000017907641&amp;fastReqId=663046700&amp;fastPos=1\">civ. 2e, 4 juillet 2007, n\u00b006-20500, Bull. n\u00b0180<\/a>, rapport Loriferne<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_6\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_6');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>6<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000018339554&amp;fastReqId=905729771&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 2e, 13 mars 2008, n\u00b007-11384<\/a>, Bull. 68, rapport Lacabarats<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_7\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_7');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>7<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000017895594&amp;fastReqId=375769350&amp;fastPos=1\">3e civ., 13 juin 2007, n\u00b006-11784<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0103, rapport Monge<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_8\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_8');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>8<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007026704&amp;fastReqId=458632872&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">3e civ. 19 juin 1991, n\u00b087-20014<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0178<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_9\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_9');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>9<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007019280&amp;fastReqId=1176957925&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 1re, 21 juillet 1987, n\u00b085-13417<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0233<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_10\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_10');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>10<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000019781227&amp;fastReqId=2019421818&amp;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Cass. civ. 1re, 19 novembre 2008, n\u00b007-12523<\/a>, Rapport Loriferne, Avis Marotte, Bull. n\u00b0251<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_11\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_11');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>11<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\">Cass. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000019966666&amp;fastReqId=615985016&amp;fastPos=1\">civ. 2e, 18 d\u00e9cembre 2008, n\u00b007-20599<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0276, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/publications_26\/bulletin_information_cour_cassation_27\/bulletins_information_2009_2866\/n_701_3145\/#c628\">BICC 701, n\u00b0628<\/a>, rapport M. Andr\u00e9.<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_12\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_12');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>12<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007040643&amp;fastReqId=1944076103&amp;fastPos=1\">Cass. civ. 10 novembre 1998, n\u00b096-16267<\/a>, Bull. n\u00b0265<\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n<tr class=\"footnotes_plugin_reference_row\"> <th scope=\"row\" id=\"footnote_plugin_reference_355_1_13\" class=\"footnote_plugin_index pointer\" onclick=\"footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1('footnote_plugin_tooltip_355_1_13');\"><a role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"footnote_plugin_link\" ><span class=\"footnote_index_arrow\">&#8593;<\/span>13<\/a><\/th> <td class=\"footnote_plugin_text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&amp;idTexte=JURITEXT000007223766&amp;fastReqId=528483137&amp;fastPos=1\">Com. 31 mai 1994, n\u00b092-10727<\/a><\/td><\/tr>\r\n\r\n <\/tbody> <\/table> <\/div><\/div><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> function footnote_expand_reference_container_355_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_355_1').show(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_355_1').text('\u2212'); } function footnote_collapse_reference_container_355_1() { jQuery('#footnote_references_container_355_1').hide(); jQuery('#footnote_reference_container_collapse_button_355_1').text('+'); } function footnote_expand_collapse_reference_container_355_1() { if (jQuery('#footnote_references_container_355_1').is(':hidden')) { footnote_expand_reference_container_355_1(); } else { footnote_collapse_reference_container_355_1(); } } function footnote_moveToReference_355_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_355_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } } function footnote_moveToAnchor_355_1(p_str_TargetID) { footnote_expand_reference_container_355_1(); var l_obj_Target = jQuery('#' + p_str_TargetID); if (l_obj_Target.length) { jQuery( 'html, body' ).delay( 0 ); jQuery('html, body').animate({ scrollTop: l_obj_Target.offset().top - window.innerHeight * 0.2 }, 380); } }<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Edit: 15 septembre 2013: en cons\u00e9quence de la r\u00e9forme des textes relatifs \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019appel avec repr\u00e9sentation obligatoire, entr\u00e9e en vigueur \u00e0 compter du 1er janvier 2011, la Cour de cassation (1)Cass. 1re civ., 10 avril 2013, n\u00b0 12-14939 indique que \u00ab\u00a0les ordonnances du conseiller de la mise en \u00e9tat statuant sur la fin&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/2009\/04\/04\/la-decision-du-juge-de-la-mise-en-etat-rejetant-une-fin-de-non-recevoir-est-elle-susceptible-dun-appel-immediat\/\">Poursuivre la lecture <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">La d\u00e9cision du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat rejetant une fin de non recevoir est-elle susceptible d\u2019un appel imm\u00e9diat?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5,23],"tags":[255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,30,267],"class_list":["post-355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-droit-francais","category-procedure-civile","tag-10-avril-2013","tag-12-14939","tag-appel-immediat","tag-article-544-cpc","tag-article-776-cpc","tag-article-914-cpc","tag-cass-1re-civ","tag-conseiller-de-la-mise-en-etat","tag-fin-de-non-recevoir","tag-incident-mettant-fin-a-linstance","tag-mise-en-etat","tag-n-12-14-939","tag-procedure-civile","tag-recevabilite-de-lappel","entry"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":358,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions\/358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.evematringe.eu\/bl0g\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}